President Trump’s divisive choice to send military forces to Los Angeles has sparked a strong and united reaction from every Democratic senator, who are all calling for the immediate removal of all troops from the city. This unusual military move, meant to stop protests against the President’s large-scale deportation plan, has drawn heavy criticism from Democrats, who see it as a major overstep of presidential authority and a violation of constitutional values.

The increase in military presence in Los Angeles started when President Trump took control of California’s National Guard without the state’s approval and then sent over 700 Marines to the area. These troops were brought in during widespread demonstrations across the nation, especially in Los Angeles, where people were protesting the istration’s mass deportation efforts. The istration claimed the deployment was meant to stop these protests, but Democrats strongly disagree, arguing that civilian law enforcement and respect for the Constitution require a different response.

As found by Axios, California Senator Alex Padilla is leading the opposition to the president’s military action. He organized a letter, signed by all 46 other Senate Democrats, urging President Trump to “immediately withdraw all military personnel that have been deployed to Los Angeles in recent days.” The letter also asked the President to “stop any further threats of sending National Guard or other active duty military personnel into American cities unless the Governor requests it.”

Trump faces backlash from every senate democrat

The protests against the istration’s deportation program have spread far beyond Los Angeles, reaching many other cities across the country. President Trump has warned that he might send troops to other areas with similar unrest, raising fears among Democrats that this could become a pattern of federal overreach. This growing worry has brought Democrats together, even though they have often been split on how to oppose the Trump istration’s policies.

The military deployment in Los Angeles and the wider debate over immigration enforcement have become key issues, uniting Democrats around a shared cause.

A key moment that deepened Democratic anger was an incident involving Senator Padilla and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Senator Padilla was forcibly taken away and handcuffed during a press conference held by Secretary Noem, an event that led to widespread outrage from Democrats. The “rough treatment of a sitting U.S. senator” was almost universally criticized by the party, making the controversy even worse. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has since called for an investigation into the incident, and many Democrats have demanded Secretary Noem’s resignation.

A major conflict has developed between pop star Taylor Swift and actress Blake Lively, starting after Lively became involved in a $400 million lawsuit filed by Justin Baldoni, her co-star in It Ends With Us, against Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. People close to Swift told Page Six that the singer had pulled away from Lively after court documents revealed Lively’s true feelings about Swift. This situation makes it very unlikely the two former close friends will ever fully repair their relationship.

The main problem comes from a private text message sent by Lively, who is 37, where she called Swift, 36, and Reynolds, 48, her “dragons,” comparing herself to the Game of Thrones character Khaleesi. This message became public as part of the legal case surrounding It Ends With Us. Swift is reportedly furious, seeing Lively’s words as a deliberate attempt to use their friendship to gain an advantage in her legal battle with Baldoni. Swift is deeply upset that Lively would even think of their relationship this way, much less put it in writing.

The once-strong friendship between Swift and Lively, built on deep trust, has now ended, and the two are no longer speaking. This happened after Baldoni’s large countersuit against Lively was dismissed. Swift, who has been enjoying huge professional success with her record-breaking Eras Tour in 2023 and 2024, as well as a highly publicized relationship with Kansas City Chiefs player Travis Kelce, was unexpectedly pulled into the legal dispute.

Taylor Swift and Blake Lively are no longer friends

Baldoni’s legal team argued that Lively was using her friendship with Swift as a strategic weapon and even tried to subpoena Swift at one point. The “dragons” text, revealed in court documents, has been especially damaging. Swift’s close friends say the description was wrong and misrepresented their relationship.

Swift never saw herself as Lively’s “dragon” or protector, nor as someone who would step in to defend her. They point out that Lively, as a grown adult married to one of Hollywood’s most powerful men, does not need that kind of help. The fact that Swift’s name was brought into this situation deeply hurts her. The damage from these leaked texts, especially the “dragons” message and the initial subpoena (later dropped), is seen as long-lasting and possibly impossible to fix.

Making things more complicated, Swift had allowed her song My Tears Ricochet to be used in the movie adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s novel It Ends With Us. However, sources say Swift never publicly ed or promoted the film, even before the legal drama started, which shows the true nature of their friendship. Their bond was reportedly based on shared hobbies and their mutual understanding of extreme wealth, not professional connections.

They bonded over baking, traveling, home decor, and their shared billionaire status, enjoying the similar lifestyles and privileges their money gave them. Swift appreciated having a friend who didn’t seem to want anything from her since Lively was already extremely wealthy. Finding out that Lively may have seen their friendship as a way to gain influence has left Swift deeply hurt, a wound that might never fully heal.

The tense confrontation between Israel and Iran continues to escalate as a series of aggressive military actions pushed the region closer to a larger conflict. Per CBS, Trump said it “would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told…” and now that’s come to . Missiles flew, and targeted attacks caused widespread destruction.

Iran quickly retaliated against Israel’s initial attack. On Friday morning, Iran sent over 100 drones toward Israel, most of which were shot down by Israel’s air defenses. Later that day and into Saturday, Iran fired multiple rounds of ballistic missiles. The first wave included about 100 missiles launched in two groups. While Israel’s Iron Dome defense system stopped most of them, a few got through, damaging buildings and causing injuries.

As reported by CBS, a second wave of dozens more missiles followed, with some again slipping past defenses, leading to reports of explosions in different parts of the country and requiring search and rescue teams to respond. Videos and photos from places like Tel Aviv showed buildings hit by missiles, some on fire.

Iran and Israel are trading missile attacks

The sharp escalation began early on Friday, when Israel launched a major military operation called “Operation Rising Lion.” This large-scale attack involved more than 200 Israeli fighter jets firing over 330 different weapons at more than 100 targets across Iran. According to Israeli military officials, the main goals of these strikes were Iran’s nuclear facilities, scientists working on nuclear programs, and top military leaders.

Specific targets included a nuclear site in the Isfahan area, where a facility for making metallic uranium and equipment for processing enriched uranium were destroyed. This was along with labs and other ing structures.

The underground section of the Natanz uranium enrichment site was also hit, damaging its multi-level enrichment hall, centrifuges, electrical systems, and other key infrastructure. Additionally, Israeli military reports confirmed that several high-ranking Iranian security officials, including the Chief of Staff, the Commander of the Revolutionary Guards, and the Head of the Emergency Command, were killed in the strikes. Israel stated that the purpose of the operation was to stop what it claimed was an Iranian plan to destroy Israel, which included developing nuclear weapons, expanding missile stockpiles, and ing proxy groups against Israel.

The United States confirmed that it helped Israel intercept Iranian missiles. During the attacks, U.S. troops at two bases in the Middle East, Union III in Baghdad, Iraq, and Al-Tanf Garrison in Syria, were ordered to take cover in bunkers for about an hour. However, the U.S. made clear that it was not involved in Israel’s initial strikes on Iran. Before the Israeli operation, the U.S. State Department had informed several allied governments in the region, stressing that this was not a U.S. operation, did not involve U.S. military assets, and that the U.S. preferred diplomacy over military action.

At the same time, the U.S. Embassy in Israel told American personnel to stay indoors, and non-essential U.S. staff had been ordered to leave Iraq days earlier, while military family were allowed to voluntarily leave the Middle East. The human and material cost of the conflict was high. In Israel, reports said 21 people were injured, two seriously, and many buildings and vehicles were damaged in areas like Ramat Gan in Tel Aviv. In Iran, officials reported 78 dead and over 320 wounded from the Israeli strikes.

Federal authorities are now charging immigrants who do not provide fingerprints, using an old law from the 1940s that had not been enforced for seventy-five years. The Alien Registration Act requires non-citizens to with the federal government, but it has been ignored for decades. The Trump istration is pushing the enforcement to bring back a World War II-era law requiring almost all U.S. non-citizens to and give their fingerprints to the government.

As found by Politico, law enforcement in several states, including Louisiana, Arizona, Montana, Alabama, Texas, and Washington, D.C., has started charging people for intentionally failing to under the Alien Registration Act. This misdemeanor crime is punishable by up to six months in jail or a fine of $1,000. Many of those charged were already in custody and going through deportation proceedings when these new charges were added.

The registration part of this 1940 law was originally ed during a time when many Americans were worried about immigrants’ loyalty to the U.S. It had not been used for seventy-five years but was still technically in effect. The Trump istration’s decision to enforce this law puts undocumented immigrants in a tough position. If they choose to , they must give the federal government detailed information that could be used against them, including how they entered the country. On the other hand, if they refuse to on purpose, they could face criminal charges, arrest, prosecution, and the risk of deportation.

Outdated laws are being used against immigrants

One possible reason for bringing back the registration rule is the expectation that people will , effectively turning themselves in by itting they entered the country illegally. However, the Trump istration has a bigger goal. It claims that another purpose of this registration system is to push undocumented immigrants toward a third option: leaving the country voluntarily. The Department of Homeland Security calls this “mass self-deportation.”

These efforts, along with the istration’s use of another old law about enemy aliens and a more aggressive approach to immigration raids, are part of a larger campaign promise to create the biggest deportation program in U.S. history. In a statement from February, the department said this long-ignored law would now be enforced. The department described “mass self-deportation” as a safer option for both non-citizens and law enforcement, and it also claimed this would save money for U.S. taxpayers.

The Alien Registration Act ed in 1940 due to fears about immigrant loyalties, includes another section that makes it a crime to advocate overthrowing the government. This part of the law was used for about twenty years to prosecute people accused of ing fascism or communism. The registration part, however, was mostly unused and had not been enforced for seventy-five years. It applies to non-citizens who have been in the U.S. for thirty days or more, regardless of their legal status.

Some legal immigrants have already met this requirement. For example, immigrants who have applied for permanent residency are considered ed by the Department of Homeland Security. Additionally, some undocumented residents are already seen as ed, such as those granted “parole,” a form of protection from deportation for humanitarian reasons. Still, the Department of Homeland Security estimates that up to 3.2 million immigrants are currently uned and could be affected by this new enforcement.

Katy Perry’s turbulent year is reportedly about to get worse. The ET singer is said to be heading toward a separation from the father of her child, Orlando Bloom.

Perry closed out last year with a poorly received album, and just when it seemed like the only way for her in 2025 was up — I mean, she literally went up to space — reality seems to have had a much lower ceiling. People found a source willing to shed light on the current dynamic between the famous couple. According to the source, the relationship is “pretty much done.”

The source made it clear this isn’t a recent development caused by a single grave mistake from the Pirates of the Caribbean star or vice versa. Instead, the issues have reportedly been brewing quietly in the background. “(They) don’t really see them being able to turn things around here,” the source said. “It’s been breaking down the last couple of months and isn’t looking good.”

So how did they get here? Well, the album flop certainly didn’t help. Titled 143, the album reportedly introduced a kind of “pressure” that hadn’t existed in their relationship before. Additionally, that much-publicized Jeff Bezos-funded space trip didn’t land well either. Although it was framed as a feminist voyage, many fans saw it as just another example of the ultra-rich indulging in what most people consider vapid distractions. Perry didn’t let the backlash to her recent moves stop her, though. She launched a follow-up tour for the album and is reportedly pouring everything into it. She’s said to be happy with the sold-out shows and fully focused on staging a comeback.

It hasn’t helped that Perry’s relationship with her fans has been especially contentious lately, with frequent online criticism. Managing that while raising a child on tour could leave anyone drained, with little energy left for anything else.

In a February interview, Perry spoke about avoiding the internet — especially the comment sections — so it’s safe to say these reports may not shake her. And just recently, in May, she name-dropped Orlando Bloom during a performance, warning fans to stop “DMing my man.” She added jokingly, “I’m going to have you removed. Seriously, get your own life.” That’s fairly recent, so it’s not entirely set in stone that the two won’t find their way back to each other.

As for where things stand now, though, the outlook appears bleak. People often underestimate how grueling a world tour can be — a different city every other night for nine months, shifting time zones, constant rehearsals. Add to that Bloom’s own active career, and the strain becomes apparent. Artists often come out of tours either burned out or divorced. It’s practically standard procedure.

The couple got engaged in 2019, and their reps haven’t responded to questions about the current state of their relationship. The reports, however, paint a clear picture of a couple facing a stage in their careers that demands just as much — if not more — effort than the beginning: the comeback. Many artists survive career slumps. Very few relationships do.

There’s a critical public safety situation still ongoing in Minnesota. There have been targeted shootings in Brooklyn Park and Champlin, where two state lawmakers — Sen. John Hoffman and Rep. Melissa Hortman — were shot alongside their spouses, prompting Governor Tim Walz to order a state emergency operation.

There’s a shelter-in-place order in effect for a three-mile radius around Edinburgh Golf Course in Brooklyn Park, warning residents not to approach the suspect, who is believed to be armed and dangerous. There’s an unusual aspect about the suspect that adds a whole other level of concern, however, as he is believed to be currently impersonating law enforcement officers. This one detail complicates the situation further and lends additional credibility to the belief that these shootings are targeted. As a result, law enforcement has issued highly unusual instructions.

Around 5:30 AM local time, police instructed residents within the designated area to stay indoors. A report from FOX 9 confirmed that authorities have yet to identify a motive. In an unusual move, police have advised residents not to cooperate with individuals claiming to be officers and not to open their doors to anyone—even those in police uniforms.

Instead, residents are being urged to wait for the arrival of two officers or to call 911 to confirm whether the officer at their door is legitimate. The suspect is reportedly a white male with brown hair, wearing black body armor over a blue shirt and blue pants.

Some updates suggest there were initially two suspects, but one has since been arrested. Residents are advised to remain vigilant, avoid engagement if they see the other suspect, and especially steer clear of Windsor Terrace North and Champlin, where active scenes are still unfolding. A reporter familiar with the situation has taken to X and informed people that a manhunt for the suspect is currently underway

In response, the former VP candidate Governor Tim Walz has activated the State Emergency Operations Center and placed all Minnesota lawmakers on high alert following the targeting of two of their colleagues. Walz also posted a firm statement on X, promising to give law enforcement all the tools and resources they need — and potentially increasing security for other lawmakers across the state.

I’ve activated the State Emergency Operations Center.

Local law enforcement in Champlin and Brooklyn Park have the full resources of the State of Minnesota behind them.

We are monitoring the situation closely and will share more information soon.

— Governor Tim Walz (@GovTimWalz) June 14, 2025

This state emergency operations differs from the LA protest situation in several key ways — chiefly in that the governor here is using the state emergency operation specifically so that he can take swift and direct action to local enforcement. Importantly, as this story continues to develop, the health conditions of the lawmakers and their spouses remain unknown. For now, hope is all we have — hope that they are recovering.

Zach Lindstrom, the Mayor of Mounds View, was the first political figure to speak out, expressing deep concern about the normalization of violence against public officials. He also shared that his thoughts are with the victims and their families, and that he genuinely hopes the lawmakers pull through.

I'm just learning of the events that took place last night due to getting a safety alert for elected officials. I never thought we'd be here. My prayers are with the Hortman, and Hoffman families. I hope everyone comes out of this ok.

I cannot emphasize enough that this is not…

— Mayor Zach Lindstrom (@MoundsViewMayor) June 14, 2025

This is still a developing story, and information continues to emerge. We’ll provide updates as they become available. Our thoughts and prayers go out to all the families affected by this violence.

In the months since Donald Trump took up the White House as the president of America for a second term, there has been nothing but chaos. Some he backed, and some he created from ground zero – the common factor being the civilians paying the price. The role the POTUS played in Israel’s latest attack on Iran is shaping up to be a deadly new example of the very hell.

Soon after the attack, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio wasted no time in distancing America from it all. He released a statement clarifying that America was not involved in the strikes and that their only “priority is protecting American forces in the region.”

“Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense. President Trump and the istration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel,” he added.

But a new report, sharing revelations by several anonymous Israeli officials, paints a very different and scandalous picture. Axios, based on its sources, has alleged that “Trump and his aides were only pretending to oppose an Israeli attack in public — and didn’t express opposition in private.”

Reportedly, Trump’s plan was to blindside Iran by convincing them that they would not be attacked. This was to ensure that Iranians on Israel’s target list don’t move to new locations. The sources have claimed that while he made calls for diplomacy, he was actually coordinating with Israel and giving his “green light” to the attack.

If true, will America face any consequences?

On paper, Trump will not have to defend or say anything. But as highlighted by ex-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, America is forgetting that it is home to Iran’s “terror cells.’

In a chat with Fox News, Pompeo reflected on Israel’s attack on Iran and the presence of Trump throughout the deadly chapter.

“It’s not just the missiles or drones, they’ll fly to Israel, but the Iranian IRGC, the very leadership the Israelis destroyed last night, has been working in nearly every country around the world, including the United States of America, to plant little terror cells all across the world. Hezbollah was doing the same.”

Though he made his of the attack clear, he also warned that these terror cells could be used to seek revenge from America. Oh, and how is Trump planning on dealing with any consequences of this attack that may or may not affect America? Go back and forth on what he thinks and offer empty words, of course.

Bernie Sanders has always been the politician of note when it comes to calling out things that people in his position usually have too many quid pro quo relationships to blurt out. Recently, Sanders took stock of Trump’s tenure so far and asked why no one in the Republican Party will just come out and call his authoritarian rule for what it is.

The recent federalization of the National Guard in California has slowly become Trump’s final straw in a lot of people’s psyche. The news cycle moves so fast these days, and with that comes the inability to properly take everything in perspective. Bernie Sanders, however—always one to go against the grain — took to X to talk about how Trump has been suing the media, investigating universities that don’t do his bidding, and even recently flirted with the idea of arresting the democratically elected governor of California.

Trump usurps the power of Congress, threatens judges who rule against him, sues the media, extorts law firms that oppose him & “investigates” universities he dislikes.

Now he wants to arrest the governor of CA.

Will a SINGLE Republican in Congress oppose his authoritarianism?

— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 11, 2025

Gavin Newsom’s relationship with Trump has fractured beyond repair at this point, and the Trump istration is now even publicly declaring that they want to “liberate” LA. But as long-time proponents of state responsibility and smaller government, questions have slowly started to arise around the Republican silence on this entire matter.

Much like the legal maneuvering Trump used in his attempt to suspend habeas corpus, he exploited a loophole in the Posse Comitatus Act — whose main role is to prevent federal troops from being used in domestic law enforcement. The act states that the federal government may intervene in the case of an attempted insurrection, which would explain the framing the Trump istration keeps using when it talks about the LA protest situation.

There’s a broader trend suggesting this is not the first time the world has seen this kind of behavior from an authoritarian leader. History is filled with figures who ramp up nationwide security features and personnel to quell off any instances of criticism. And that’s clearly what Bernie Sanders was alluding to. That this is happening as Trump plans a military parade for his birthday — and is threatening any protesters who have a problem with it — suggests a really grim outlook for the near future.

In the comments, opinions on Sen. Sanders were quite split. One pointed out that even Elon Musk had to walk back his comments. Some didn’t even bother defending Trump’s actions and instead accused Democrats of also doing this sort of thing for years.

Elon Musk tried, didn't last long. Doubt any Republican in ckngress has the courage for this.

— Chris Summer (@TVision36898) June 11, 2025

Sounds like the exact same things Democrats have been doing to conservatives for years and years!!

— Thomas O'Connor '62 baby, #GodBlessAmerica (@TheyCallMeTomO1) June 11, 2025

Things are moving fast, and regardless of personal political opinions, various groups have moved to court to challenge Trump’s decisions, believing many of them lean on the illegal side. And as the courts hand out rulings as quickly as they possibly can, it seems Californians are expressing their disapproval of the deployment, with 63% of people in the state reportedly against it in a particular poll.

The US has grown extremely polarized. And Trump—whether he means to or not—has become a human stress test of the institutional checks and balances. With every move, he exerts more pressure on just how much the executive can bend laws to its will. Sen. Sanders is ultimately right: this is more than just another two-party political duel. A lot more is on the line.

Actor Jeff Goldblum revealed his memorable encounter with Beatles legend Paul McCartney during a recent appearance on Late Night with Seth Meyers. The 72-year-old Wicked star, known for his iconic role as Dr. Ian Malcolm in the Jurassic Park franchise, shared his experience of meeting McCartney backstage at Broadway’s Good Night, and Good Luck, which concluded its limited run on June 8.

During his visit to the show, Goldblum had the opportunity to meet the play’s leading man, George Clooney, and other stars backstage. Among these celebrities was the 82-year-old McCartney, marking the first time Goldblum had seen the musician in person.

According to People, the Jurassic Park actor expressed his excitement about the encounter, itting to feeling starstruck. When describing the interaction, Goldblum shared McCartney’s enthusiastic response to seeing him, recalling the musician’s words: “Jeff, Jeff Goldblum. I love Jeff Goldblum. Come here, Jeff, let’s take a picture.” The actor added that the experience “made my life and my year.”

Goldblum shares childhood memories of the Beatles’ influence

The encounter prompted Goldblum to reminisce about his childhood connection to the Beatles’ music. He shared a personal story about listening to iconic Beatles songs from the band that remains culturally relevant decades after their peak, like “I Want to Hold Your Hand” and “She Loves You,” when he was 12 or 13 years old, alongside memories of a friend named Suzy Connolly.

During the interview, Goldblum humorously mentioned that while he couldn’t if he and McCartney shook hands, he joked about potentially grabbing the musician’s entire arm if they did. He even demonstrated this gesture on host Seth Meyers, playfully suggesting he might never have washed his hands afterward.

The actor acknowledged his tendency to name-drop celebrities during the conversation with Meyers. He itted to being impressed by the notable figures he has met throughout his career, stating that he often has to restrain himself from mentioning these encounters.

This backstage meeting occurred during Goldblum’s visit to see Good Night, and Good Luck on Broadway, where both he and McCartney were present to George Clooney and the cast. The encounter clearly left a lasting impression on Goldblum, who described the moment as particularly meaningful due to his long-standing iration for the Beatles and their music.

Kelley Wolf, the estranged wife of Party of Five star Scott Wolf, was taken into police custody on Friday, June 13, as documented in a video ed to her Instagram profile. The incident occurred merely three days after the public announcement of her separation from Scott Wolf, her husband of 21 years, adding to 2024’s devastating year for celebrity breakups.

According to People, the video, which primarily displayed a black screen until its final moments, captured the interaction between Kelley and responding police officers. In the footage, she can be heard expressing distress, saying, “Oh my God. Don’t. Oh my God, this is not happening.”

During the encounter, Kelley told officers she would “go on my own,” with what appeared to be the sound of handcuffs audible in the background. She addressed the officers, stating, “This is shameful, gentlemen. Look at this, look at this woman, this is shameful. Be ashamed, be ashamed of yourselves, gentlemen.”

Police cite concerns over concerning comments as reason for welfare check

The responding officers clarified that Kelley, 48, was not being taken to jail but rather to “get some help.” They explained their presence was due to concerning comments she had made to her father and others, prompting them to check on her welfare.

Following the incident, Kelley shared a photo of her belongings on Instagram Stories, claiming she had been “taken against my will” and asked followers to “check on my kids.” In the same post, she paradoxically stated she was “happy” and “happier than I have ever been,” while describing the situation as “one of the darkest things I’ve ever experienced.”

The incident follows the recent announcement of her separation from Wolf, with whom she shares three children: sons Jackson and Miller, and daughter Lucy. In her June 10 statement, Kelley had described her journey toward separation as “long” and “quiet,” emphasizing her commitment to maintaining integrity and comion throughout the process.

Scott Wolf, 57, had also released a statement describing the split as “the most difficult decision of my life,” ing the unfortunate trend of beloved celebrity couples calling it quits, and revealed he had filed for divorce. He requested privacy during this period, particularly to help guide their children through this transition. Neither Kelley nor Scott’s representatives have responded to requests for comment regarding the police incident.

A jaw-dropping video out of Georgia is making waves across the internet, showing what many are calling one of the most irresponsible parenting moments caught on camera in recent memory.

According to The Newnan Times-Herald, the Georgia parents giving toddler beer caught on video incident centers on Craig Banks Jr. and Paetyn Gregory, who were arrested after surveillance footage showed them allegedly giving beer to their one-year-old child inside a Coweta County restaurant.

Banks gave the child beer while Gregory laughed

According to reports, the footage, recorded at Old Chicago Pizza + Taproom in Fischer Crossing, shows Banks sneaking sips of beer into the toddler’s mouth while Gregory sits beside him, laughing and watching the surroundings to make sure no one is watching.

According to Coweta County deputies, this wasn’t a one-time slip-up—it reportedly happened multiple times that evening.

When confronted by staff and later questioned by authorities, Banks initially denied the accusation. He allegedly told police, “My baby is 1, why the [expletive] would I do that?”

But once investigators reviewed the footage, the story changed. Gregory eventually itted that they weren’t thinking clearly, calling the moment “a dumb decision.”

That off-the-cuff remark has now become the headline heard around the country—and the internet isn’t letting them forget it.

Baby beer boneheads face charges

Banks, 34, is from Hogansville, and Gregory, 30, is from Newnan. Both are now facing charges of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. They’re being held in the Coweta County Jail, and their child has been placed with a relative while Georgia’s Division of Family and Children Services (DFACS) investigates further.

This isn’t just about an outrageous video. Medical experts have pointed out that even small amounts of alcohol can be extremely dangerous to a toddler’s developing body. A child that young can suffer from dangerously low blood sugar, drops in blood pressure, and even alcohol poisoning after just a few sips. That’s part of why the public backlash has been so intense.

“They deserve all that is coming to them”

The clip has gone viral on social media, sparking widespread condemnation. People are understandably shocked and angry. The idea of laughing while ing beer to a baby is so far outside the bounds of responsible parenting that it feels almost surreal.

Commenters on TikTok, Facebook, and X have called for strict legal consequences and demanded that DFACS take serious action to ensure the child’s safety.

The restaurant staff, to their credit, acted quickly. They noticed something was off, reviewed the video, and notified law enforcement. Their vigilance likely stopped the situation from getting worse.

Now, all eyes are on what happens next. Court dates are expected soon for Banks and Gregory, and DFACS is continuing its investigation into the family’s home situation. Depending on what’s uncovered, the couple could face long-term restrictions on their parental rights.

If the last few months have shown us anything it’s that Donald Trump is a power hungry tyrant hell bent on getting his grubby fingers on as much power as he can. The dictator comparisons have been coming from all sides of the political board but Democratic Rep Yassamin Ansari was the only one thoughtful enough to provide us with a helpful list of every reason Trump is a dictator.

In a video shared to her Instagram the Democratic representative for Arizona’s 3rd congressional district called out Scott Perry for mocking the idea of Trump being a dictator. It seems many Republicans are still in denial. Anyways, Ansari made a pretty compelling case as to why we should be referring to the president as a dictator. 

A long list of reasons to be wary of Donald Trump

Considering he only took office at the start of this year Trump has already done plenty of things that could be considered dictator-y. Literally the day he was sworn in he pardoned the violent January 6th insurrectionists. pardoning literal criminals just because they you doesn’t exactly scream “democracy.”

Ansari’s been keeping track of his actions, every unconstitutional move the president has made so far has been listed and it all comes together to back up her dictator claims. She mentions his defiance of Supreme Court orders, his methodical dismantling of multiple federal agencies, his deportation of people to foreign prisons without due process. Honestly the list is too long to go into full detail here, but when you have the benefit of hindsight it’s surprising just how much Trump is behaving like a tyrant.

Obviously we can’t forget his military parade for his birthday. Ansari asks “is this North Korea?” It almost seems like Trump expects U.S. citizens to worship him. 

Is the president intentionally causing chaos?

Ansari also touches on Trump’s use of military force “without the consent of local authorities or the state’s governor.” Typically a governor would have to consent to the National Guard being deployed in their state but the president has undermined California governor Gavin Newsom and sent them in to quell the protests in L.A. anyway.

The whole ordeal has caused chaos and Ansari compares it to a “dystopian, horrific episode of Black Mirror.” As the president continues to drag the U.S. into fascism while we all just stand by and watch. Comments responding to Ansari’s speech on Instagram agreed with her, one person wrote, “Yep…sounds like we officially live in the FORMER United States of America.” Others called for impeachment.

It seems more people are finally opening their eyes and realizing the threat Trump poses to democracy. The events of the last week have only served to show his true nature. We don’t need to wait for the next season of Black Mirror, we’re living it.